Can the use of azithromycin during labour reduce the incidence of infection among puerperae and newborns? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated whether the use of azithromycin during labour or caesarean section reduces the incidence of sepsis and infection among mothers and newborns. DATA SOURCES: We independently searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases for relevant studies published before February, 2024. METHODS: We included RCTs that evaluated the effect of prenatal oral or intravenous azithromycin or placebo on intrapartum or postpartum infection incidence. We included studies evaluating women who had vaginal births as well as caesarean sections. Studies reporting maternal and neonatal infections were included in the current analysis. Review Manager 5.4 was used to analyse 6 randomized clinical trials involving 44,448 mothers and 44,820 newborns. The risk of bias of each included study was assessed using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.Primary outcomes included the incidence of maternal sepsis and all-cause mortality and neonatal sepsis and all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included maternal (endometritis, wound and surgical site infections, chorioamnionitis, and urinary tract infections) and neonatal outcomes (infections of the eyes, ears and skin). A random-effects model was used to test for overall effects and heterogeneity. RESULTS: The pooled odds ratios (ORs) were as follows: 0.65 for maternal sepsis (95% CI, 0.55-0.77; I2, 0%; P < .00001); 0.62 for endometritis (95% CI, 0.52-0.74; I2, 2%; P < .00001); and 0.43 for maternal wound or surgical site infection (95% CI, 0.24-0.78; P < .005); however, there was great heterogeneity among the studies (I2, 75%). The pooled OR for pyelonephritis and urinary tract infections was 0.3 (95% CI, 0.17-0.52; I2, 0%; P < .0001), and that for neonatal skin infections was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.35-0.65; I2, 0%, P < .00001). There was no significant difference in maternal all-cause mortality or incidence of chorioamnionitis between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of neonatal sepsis or suspected sepsis, all-cause mortality, or infections of the eyes or ears. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, azithromycin use during labour reduced the incidence of maternal sepsis, endometritis, incisional infections and urinary tract infections but did not reduce the incidence of neonatal-associated infections, except for neonatal skin infections. These findings indicate that azithromycin may be potentially beneficial for maternal postpartum infections, but its effect on neonatal prognosis remains unclear. Azithromycin should be used antenatally only if the clinical indication is clear and the potential benefits outweigh the harms.

Can Clean Delivery Kits Prevent Infections? Lessons from Traditional Birth Attendants in Nigeria.

Background: In resource-poor settings, perinatal infections contribute significantly to maternal and neonatal deaths, and the use of clean delivery kits (CDKs) has been proposed as a tool to reduce the risk of infection-related deaths. This study aims to assess the acceptability and effectiveness of CDKs in preventing infections in deliveries attended by traditional birth attendants (TBAs) in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Methods: The study was a cluster-randomized trial with 67 birth centres/clusters, 453 births/mothers, and 457 babies randomized to intervention or control arms; intervention involved supplementation of delivery with JANMA CDKs. Interviews were conducted at the birth homes, and the primary outcomes were neonatal infection and puerperal fever. The association between infection and perinatal risk factors was tested using the Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Results: CDKs were well accepted by TBAs. The incidence of puerperal fever and neonatal infection was 1.1% and 11.2%, respectively. Concurrent infection was found in 1 (0.22%) of the mother-neonate pair. There was no significant association between any of the sociodemographic factors and infection for both mothers and neonates. PROM and prolonged labour were significantly associated with puerperal infection. All mothers with puerperal fever were from the control group. Compared to the control group, the relative risk of puerperal infection and neonatal infection in the intervention group was 0.08 (0.004 -1.35, p = 0.079) and 0.64 (0.37 to 1.1, p = 0.10), respectively. Conclusion: CDKs hold promising results in attenuating maternal infections in resource-poor settings. Larger studies with greater statistical power are required to establish statistically reliable information.

Antibiotic Recommendations After Postpartum Uterine Exploration or Instrumentation.

Importance: Multiple postpartum scenarios require uterine exploration or instrumentation. These may introduce bacteria into the uterus, increasing the risk of endometritis. Data on the use of antibiotics in these scenarios is limited, resulting in few guidelines and divergent care. Objective: To describe postpartum scenarios requiring uterine exploration and/or instrumentation, review data on antibiotic prophylaxis, and delineate antibiotic recommendations for each scenario. Evidence Acquisition: Original articles were obtained from literature search in PubMed, MEDLINE, and OVID; pertinent articles were reviewed. Results: These recommendations are based on published evidence and professional society guidelines. Antibiotic prophylaxis following manual placenta removal should include 1-time combination of ampicillin 2 g intravenously (IV) or cefazolin 1 g IV, plus metronidazole 500 mg IV. Antibiotic prophylaxis before postpartum dilation and curettage, manual vacuum aspiration, and intrauterine balloon tamponade should include 1-time combination of ampicillin 2 g IV plus metronidazole 500 mg IV. If the patient in any of the above scenarios has received group B Streptococcus prophylaxis, then only metronidazole is recommended. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to optimize these regimens. Conclusions: Uterine exploration or instrumentation increases the risk of postpartum endometritis and requires antibiotic prophylaxis. For manual placenta removal, we recommend 1-time combination of ampicillin 2 g IV or cefazolin 1 g IV, plus metronidazole 500 mg IV. For dilation and curettage, manual vacuum aspiration, and intrauterine balloon tamponade, we recommend 1-time combination of ampicillin 2 g IV plus metronidazole 500 mg IV. For patients who already received antibiotic prophylaxis for group B Streptococcus, we recommend 1-time dose of metronidazole 500 mg IV. Relevance: Providers can utilize our guidelines to prevent postpartum endometritis in these scenarios requiring postpartum uterine exploration and/or instrumentation.

Assisted vaginal births: women who tear or have a surgical cut need prompt antibiotics.

The studyHumphries ABC, Linsell L, Knight M. Factors associated with infection after operative vaginal birth-a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of infection following operative vaginal birth. AJOG 2023;228:328.To read the full NIHR Alert, go to: https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/alert/assisted-vaginal-births-women-need-prompt-antibiotics/.

Association between interleukin-19 gene polymorphisms and maternal puerperal infection.

Any bacterial infection of the genital tract after childbirth is called maternal puerperal infection. This infection accounts for 13% of pregnancy-related deaths and is the fifth leading cause of maternal mortality. Endometritis (postpartum uterine infection) has been associated with preeclampsia and maternal lethal bleeding in recent decades. In some studies, the presence of meconium in the amniotic fluid has been implicated in the development of endometritis. The study aimed to evaluate the association between interleukin-19 gene polymorphisms and maternal puerperal infection. In this study, 300 pregnant women with a gestational age of at least 37 weeks were studied. Patients were divided into two groups of 150 controls and cases. In the case group, amniotic fluid was impregnated with meconium, and in the control group, it was clear fluid. Both groups underwent cesarean section, and all received prophylactic antibiotics before surgery. Patients were evaluated for purpura infection in the first 40 days after delivery. Five ml of venous blood was taken from each patient and transferred to a tube containing EDTA anticoagulant. Genomic DNA was isolated using a particular kit. Then, the polymerase chain reaction was performed by the ARMS method. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test and SPSS software version 19 in case and control groups. This study's results indicate no significant difference in the frequency of AG, GG, and AA genotypes at position rs2243191 and rs1028181 IL-19 gene polymorphism between patients with puerperal infection and the control group (P>0.05). Also, no significant difference was observed in the frequency of both G and A alleles in the mentioned situations between patients and the control group (P>0.05). Based on the results of this study, no significant relationship was observed between IL-19 gene polymorphism at rs2243191 and rs1028181 locus and puerperal infection.

Single-dose versus multiple-dose antibiotics prophylaxis for preventing caesarean section postpartum infections: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section, a common obstetric surgical procedure, is a major predisposing factor for puerperal infections, requiring the need for antibiotic prophylaxis. Evidence suggests that single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis has comparable efficacy to multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis, but with a lower cost and risk of antibiotic resistance. However, single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis after caesarean section is not generally used in many centres in sub-Saharan Africa. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of single- versus multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent post-caesarean section infections. METHODOLOGY: This open-label, randomized controlled trial involved 162 consenting patients admitted for caesarean section (elective or emergency) at the Federal Medical Centre Keffi. They were distributed randomly into treatment arm A or B. Subjects in both arms received intravenous ceftriaxone (1 g) and metronidazole (500 mg) 30-60 min before incision; subjects in arm B received additional parenteral doses for 48 h and then cefuroxime 500 mg tablets every 12 h and metronidazole 400 mg tablets every 8 h for 5 days. The patients were monitored for 2 weeks for evidence of wound infection, febrile morbidity and clinical endometritis. RESULT: There was no statistical difference in the incidence of wound infection (6.6% versus 7.4%; p = .882) and febrile morbidity (11.8% versus 11.1%, p = .807). However, clinical endometritis (0.0% versus 6.1%, p = .028) was statistically significant with none reported in the single-dose arm. CONCLUSION: Single-dose ceftriaxone and metronidazole is as effective as multiple doses for antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent post-caesarean section infections. Adoption of this approach in low-risk patients would reduce the cost of prophylactic antibiotics, workload for staff and antibiotic resistance.

Pre-Caesarean Section Vaginal Preparation with Chlorhexidine Solution in Preventing Puerperal Infectious Morbidities: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Globally, peripartum or puerperal infections account for about one tenth of maternal mortality, most of which occur in low income countries. Therefore, vaginal preparation with an antiseptic prior to a caesarean delivery could be considered an additional measure to prevent subsequent infectious morbidities. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate vaginal preparation with 0.3% chlorhexidine solution in the prevention of endometritis, surgical site infection and post-operative fever following emergency caesarean section. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted among 240 participants planned for emergency caesarean sections (CS) at term in the University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital Complex, Ondo State, Nigeria. Participants were randomised into either group "A" (study) or "B" (control). The former had vaginal preparation with 0.3% chlorhexidine gluconate immediately after anaesthesia while the latter received normal saline. Participants were followed up post-operatively during which clinical features of puerperal infectious morbidities were observed for each during admission as well as 8th and 14th days after delivery. RESULTS: The rate and risk of endometritis were significantly lower in the study group compared to the control; 5.0% versus 13.3%, respectively (chi squared =5.004; p=0.042, RR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.15-0.94; p = 0.042; RRR = 0.62). Post-operative fever and surgical site infection, were also lower in the study group compared to the controls, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: When compared to placebo, pre-caesarean section vaginal preparation with 0.3% chlorhexidine solution significantly reduced only the rate and risk of post-operative endometritis among infectious morbidities.

CONTEXTE: À l'échelle mondiale, infections péripartum ou puerpérales représentent environ un dixième de la mortalité maternelle, dont la plupart se produisent dans les pays à faible revenu. Par conséquent, la préparation vaginale avec un antiseptique avant un accouchement par césarienne pourrait être considéré comme un mesure supplémentaire pour prévenir les morbidités infectieuses subséquentes. OBJECTIFS: Évaluer la préparation vaginale avec 0.3%solution de chlorhexidine dans la prévention de l'endométrite, site chirurgical infection et fièvre postopératoire après une césarienne d'urgence section. MÉTHODES: Cet essai prospectif randomisé contrôlé (ECR)a été menée auprès de 240 participants prévus pour une urgence césariennes (CS) à terme à l'Université des sciences médicales Complexe hospitalier universitaire, État d'Ondo, Nigéria. Les participants étaient randomisé dans le groupe "A" (étude) ou "B" (témoin). Celui-là avait une préparation vaginale avec 0.3 % de gluconate de chlorhexidine immédiatement après l'anesthésie alors que ce dernier a reçu une solution saline normale. Les participants ont été suivis postopératoirement au cours desquels des caractéristiques de morbidité infectieuse puerpérale ont été observées pour chaquelors de l'admission ainsi que les 8ème et 14ème jours après la livraison. RÉSULTATS: Le taux et le risque d'endométrite étaient significativement plus faibles dans le groupe d'étude par rapport au groupe témoin; 5.0 % contre 13.3 %, respectivement (chi carré =5.004; p=0.042, RR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.15­0.94; p = 0.042; RRR = 0.62). Fièvre postopératoire et infection du site chirurgical, étaient également plus faibles dans le groupe d'étude par rapport aux témoins, mais lela différence n'était pas statistiquement significative. CONCLUSION: Par rapport au placebo, pré-césarienne préparation vaginale avec une solution de chlorhexidine à 0.3% significativement réduit uniquement le taux et le risque d'endométrite postopératoire chez morbidités infectieuses. Mots-clés: Chlorhexidine, Préparation Vaginale, Infection Puerpéral emorbidité, Césarienne, Endométrite, Fièvre Postopératoire, Infection Du Site Chirurgical.

Scientific Evidence Supporting Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine Efficacy and Safety in People Planning to Conceive or Who Are Pregnant or Lactating.

Three coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have been authorized for use in the United States; specifically, the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson-Janssen COVID-19 vaccines were granted emergency use authorization by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in late 2020 and early 2021. Vaccination coverage and intent among adults are lowest among those aged 18-39 years and among females in particular. In females of reproductive age, enthusiasm for receiving a COVID-19 vaccine may be negatively affected by claims currently circulating widely on diverse social media platforms regarding the vaccines adversely affecting fertility and pregnancy. Yet it is important to note that these claims are anecdotal in nature and not supported by the available scientific evidence. It is also imperative that the effects of COVID-19 vaccine on reproductive health are clarified. Herein, we discuss the existing scientific data supporting COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy in people who are planning to conceive or who are pregnant or lactating and highlight the importance of COVID-19 vaccination in females of reproductive age.

What can the early infection preventing pioneers teach infection prevention and control teams today?

BACKGROUND: Puerperal fever and erysipelas were common Streptococcal infections of the 18th and 19th centuries which caused extensive nosocomial outbreaks. With dramatic clinical presentations and high-mortality, physicians struggled to understand and prevent them. Three infection prevention and control (IPC) pioneers (Gordon, Holmes and Semmelweis) in the pre-antibiotic and pre-epidemiology era made significant discoveries. Although much has been written of their breakthroughs, this has been selective and at times misinterpreted. METHODS: The primary sources of the three IPC pioneers (1 translation) were reviewed to present 3 narratives of their discoveries. An interpretation of the pioneers' discoveries in the current context is provided. RESULTS: The IPC pioneers' achievements are much wider than acknowledged in extant hand hygiene guidance - in relation to the role of indirect contact transmission (environment and equipment), e.g. Semmelweis considered the primary measure to prevent infection to be the avoidance of contamination - not hand hygiene. CONCLUSIONS: The pioneers provided strong evidence of both direct and indirect transmission to significant 18th -19th century infections. They make a strong case for environment and equipment decontamination and cleanliness alongside decontaminating hands.

Factors Affecting Postpartum Infection: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Puerperal infection is used to describe any bacterial infection of the reproductive tract after delivery. Identifying the factors affecting postpartum infections can reduce the risk and complications of such factors and postpartum maternal mortality. OBJECTIVE: This structured study was designed to evaluate factors affecting postpartum infections. METHODS: In this study, after selecting Scopus, PubMed, SID, and Web of Science electronic databases, all observational studies (cohort and case-control) available and published in Farsi and English to investigate factors affecting postpartum infections were searched. The search was performed using the terms postpartum, infection, wound infection, puerperium, reason, risk factor, and their equivalent Persian words from 2010 to November 2019 regardless of publication status. RESULTS: Out of the 3227 studies obtained, 19 were reviewed after removing irrelevant articles, duplicates (shared in databases), and animal samples. Age, level of education, delivery method, presence of episiotomy, anemia due to postpartum hemorrhage, interventions and manipulations during childbirth, prenatal hygiene, Povidone Iodine usage before delivery to wash the vagina, antibiotic prevention, increased labor duration, obesity, and the presence of bacteria were common symptoms affecting postpartum infection. CONCLUSION: In this study, the factors affecting postpartum infection have been identified, some of which are avoidable. Identifying these factors helps reduce postpartum infections and their complications.

Prophylactic postoperative antibiotics after emergent cesarean delivery and risk of postpartum infection or wound complication.

BACKGROUND: Emergent cesarean delivery (CD) carries a high risk for postpartum infection. In cases with a "splash" povidone-iodine (PI) skin preparation, prophylactic postoperative antibiotics (PP-Abx) are sometimes utilized, but the benefit is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the use of PP-Abx decreases postpartum infection after emergent CD with "splash" PI skin preparation. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study of patients undergoing emergent CD with PI skin preparation from July 2012 to April 2020 at a single institution. Cases were identified using a natural language search engine, DEEP-6, with key terms "emergent" and "cesarean delivery." Patients with chorioamnionitis or non-PI skin preparation (e.g. chlorhexidine) were excluded. The primary exposure was use of PP-Abx. The primary outcome was postpartum infection or wound complication, defined as a composite: endometritis, wound infection, cellulitis, seroma, hematoma, or intra-abdominal abscess. Rates of postpartum infection or wound complication were stratified by use of PP-Abx. Demographic and labor characteristics were evaluated as confounders. Statistics by χ2, t-test, and logistic regression (α = 0.05). RESULTS: In total, 481 patients underwent emergent CD; of those, 370 had PI skin preparation and were included. PP-Abx were given in 43% (160/370) of cases, including: cefazolin (n = 137), gentamicin/clindamycin (n = 18), azithromycin (n = 3), and vancomycin (n = 2). Those receiving PP-Abx were similar to those who did not, except the PP-Abx group was younger with longer CD duration. The rate of postpartum infection or wound complication was no different in patients who received PP-Abx compared to those who did not (12.6% vs. 9.5%, p = .34). This finding remained unchanged after multivariable adjustment (aOR 1.2, CI 0.61-2.4, p = .60). Moreover, the rate of postpartum infection or wound complication did not vary by antibiotic choice. CONCLUSIONS: After emergent CD with PI skin preparation, routine use of prophylactic postoperative antibiotics does not appear to reduce the rate of postpartum infection or wound complication, which is important as we consider antibiotic stewardship. More studies are needed to identify treatments that decrease infectious morbidity with emergent CD.

SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) and the Teaching of Ignaz Semmelweis and Florence Nightingale: a Lesson of Public Health from History, after the "Introduction of Handwashing" (1847).

Ignác Fülöp Semmelweis (1818-1865) and Florence Nightingale (1820-1910) were two important personalities in the history of medicine and public health. They dealt with the problem of handwashing. Semmelweis is also known as the "father of hand hygiene"; just in 1847 he discovered the etiology and prophylaxis of puerperal sepsis and imposed a new rule mandating handwashing with chlorine for doctors. He also tried to persuade European scientific community of the advantages of handwashing. During the Crimean War, in Scutary (Turkey), Florence Nightingale strengthened handwashing and other hygiene practices in the war hospital where she worked and her handwashing practices reached a reductions in infections. Unfortunately the hygiene practices promoted by Semmelweis and Nightingale were not widely adopted. In general handwashing promotion stood still for over a century. During current pandemic SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) one of the most important way to prevent the spread of the virus is still to wash the hands frequently.

Preincision adjunctive prophylaxis for cesarean deliveries a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically review the relative effectiveness of preincision cefazolin with or without adjunctive prophylaxis (macrolides or metronidazole) vs cefazolin alone in decreasing the incidence of postcesarean delivery surgical site infections. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic search on PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from October 25, 2020, to November 25, 2020, to identify studies comparing cefazolin with adjunctive macrolides or metronidazole with cefazolin alone. The reference lists were reviewed, and a manual search of articles published after the last database search was performed. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Overall, 3 randomized controlled trials and 1 prospective observational study of reproductive-age women undergoing cesarean deliveries were included in the study. We excluded studies of women who were immunocompromised (eg, patients who were HIV positive) or women with a diagnosis of chorioamnionitis before cesarean delivery. All patients received first-line cefazolin (either cefazolin 1 g or 2 g). We compared preincision cefazolin alone with preincision cefazolin plus adjunctive therapy (500 mg, oral or intravenous formulations of azithromycin, metronidazole, or clarithromycin). METHODS: A total of 6 review authors independently assessed the risk of bias for each study, using the Cochrane Risk of Bias criteria. Synthesis and further appraisal were done using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation levels and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists appraisal guidelines. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Treatment effects were evaluated using meta-analysis, and pooled relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were generated using random-effects models using the Review Manager 5 software (version 5.4.1). RESULTS: Overall, 3 randomized controlled trials and 1 prospective observational study representing 2613 women met the criteria for inclusion. Significant reductions in surgical site infections (relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.63; 3 randomized controlled trials) and the duration of hospital stay (weighted mean difference, -1.46; 95% confidence interval, -2.21 to -0.71; 2 randomized controlled trials) were observed with preincision cefazolin and adjunctive prophylaxis compared with cefazolin alone. No significant difference was observed in maternal febrile morbidity (relative risk, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-1.25; 2 randomized controlled trials). CONCLUSION: Our findings have provided evidence for the use of preincision adjunctive extended-spectrum prophylaxis with cefazolin over cefazolin alone. However, future investigations are required to establish the relative efficacies of different adjunctive antibiotic options.

Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section.

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section increases the risk of postpartum infection for women and prophylactic antibiotics have been shown to reduce the incidence; however, there are adverse effects. It is important to identify the most effective class of antibiotics to use and those with the least adverse effects.  OBJECTIVES: To determine, from the best available evidence, the balance of benefits and harms between different classes of antibiotic given prophylactically to women undergoing caesarean section, considering their effectiveness in reducing infectious complications for women and adverse effects on both mother and infant. SEARCH METHODS: For this 2020 update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (2 December 2019), and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different classes of prophylactic antibiotics given to women undergoing caesarean section.  RCTs published in abstract form were also included. We excluded trials that compared drugs with placebo or drugs within a specific class; these are assessed in other Cochrane Reviews. We excluded quasi-RCTs and cross-over trials. Cluster-RCTs were eligible for inclusion but none were identified. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and carried out data extraction. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included 39 studies, with 33 providing data (8073 women). Thirty-two studies (7690 women) contributing data administered antibiotics systemically, while one study (383 women) used lavage and was analysed separately. We identified three main comparisons that addressed clinically important questions on antibiotics at caesarean section (all systemic administration), but we only found studies for one comparison, 'antistaphylococcal cephalosporins (1st and 2nd generation) versus broad spectrum penicillins plus betalactamase inhibitors'.   We found no studies for the following comparisons: 'antistaphylococcal cephalosporins (1st and 2nd generation) versus lincosamides' and 'antistaphylococcal cephalosporins (1st and 2nd generation) versus lincosamides plus aminoglycosides'. Twenty-seven studies (22 provided data) included comparisons of cephalosporins (only) versus penicillins (only). However for this update, we only pooled data relating to different sub-classes of penicillins and cephalosporins where they are known to have similar spectra of action against agents likely to cause infection at caesarean section. Eight trials, providing data on 1540 women, reported on our main comparison, 'antistaphylococcal cephalosporins (1st and 2nd generation) versus broad spectrum penicillins plus betalactamase inhibitors'. We found data on four other comparisons of cephalosporins (only) versus penicillins (only) using systemic administration: antistaphylococcal cephalosporins (1st and 2nd generation) versus non-antistaphylococcal penicillins (natural and broad spectrum) (9 studies, 3093 women); minimally antistaphylococcal cephalosporins (3rd generation) versus non-antistaphylococcal penicillins (natural and broad spectrum) (4 studies, 854 women); minimally antistaphylococcal cephalosporins (3rd generation) versus broad spectrum penicillins plus betalactamase inhibitors (2 studies, 865 women); and minimally antistaphylococcal cephalosporins (3rd generation) versus broad spectrum and antistaphylococcal penicillins (1 study, 200 women). For other comparisons of different classes of antibiotics, only a small number of trials provided data for each comparison, and in all but one case data were not pooled. For all comparisons, there was a lack of good quality data and important outcomes often included few women. Three of the studies that contributed data were undertaken with drug company funding, one was funded by the hospital, and for all other studies the funding source was not reported. Most of the studies were at unclear risk of selection bias, reporting bias and other biases, partly due to the inclusion of many older trials where trial reports did not provide sufficient methodological information. We undertook GRADE assessment on the only main comparison reported by the included studies, antistaphylococcal cephalosporins (1st and 2nd generation) versus broad spectrum penicillins plus betalactamase inhibitors, and the certainty ranged from low to very low, mostly due to concerns about risk of bias, wide confidence intervals (CI), and few events. In terms of the primary outcomes for our main comparison of 'antistaphylococcal cephalosporins (1st and 2nd generation) versus broad spectrum penicillins plus betalactamase inhibitors': only one small study reported sepsis, and there were too few events to identify clear differences between the drugs (risk ratio (RR) 2.37, 95% CI 0.10 to 56.41, 1 study, 75 women, very low-certainty evidence). There may be little or no difference between these antibiotics in preventing endometritis (RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.60, 7 studies, 1161 women; low-certainty evidence). None of the included studies reported on infant sepsis or infant oral thrush. For our secondary outcomes, we found there may be little or no difference between interventions for maternal fever (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.75, 3 studies, 678 women; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain of the effects on maternal: wound infection (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.90, 4 studies, 543 women), urinary tract infection (average RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.73, 4 studies, 496 women), composite adverse effects (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.09 to 10.50, 2 studies, 468 women), and skin rash (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.28 to 4.1, 3 studies, 591 women) (all very low certainty evidence). Although maternal allergic reactions were reported by two studies, there were no events. There were no infant outcomes reported in the included studies. For the other comparisons, the results for most outcomes had wide CIs, few studies and few women included. None of the included trials reported on longer-term maternal outcomes, or on any infant outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on the best currently available evidence, 'antistaphylococcal cephalosporins' and 'broad spectrum penicillins plus betalactamase inhibitors' may have similar efficacy at caesarean section when considering immediate postoperative infection, although we did not have clear evidence for several important outcomes. Most trials administered antibiotics at or after cord clamping, or post-operatively, so results may have limited applicability to current practice which generally favours administration prior to skin incision. We have no data on any infant outcomes, nor on late infections (up to 30 days) in the mother; these are important gaps in the evidence that warrant further research. Antimicrobial resistance is very important but more appropriately investigated by other trial designs.

Gestational iron deficiency anemia is associated with preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, and postpartum infections.

OBJECTIVES: Gestational IDA has been linked to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, but the impact of iron supplementation on outcome measures remains unclear. Our objective was to assess the effects of gestational IDA on pregnancy outcomes and compare outcomes in pregnancies treated with either oral or intravenous iron supplementation. METHODS: We evaluated maternal and neonatal outcomes in 215 pregnancies complicated with gestational IDA (Hb<100 g/L) and delivered in our tertiary unit between January 2016 and October 2018. All pregnancies from the same period served as a reference group (n=11,545). 163 anemic mothers received oral iron supplementation, and 52 mothers received intravenous iron supplementation. RESULTS: Gestational IDA was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (10.2% vs. 6.1%, p=0.009) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) (1.9% vs. 0.3%, p=0.006). The gestational IDA group that received intravenous iron supplementation had a greater increase in Hb levels compared to those who received oral medication (18.0 g/L vs. 10.0 g/L, p<0.001), but no statistically significant differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the reference group, prematurity, FGR, postpartum infections, and extended hospital stays were more common among mothers with gestational IDA, causing an additional burden on the families and the healthcare system.

Postpartum endometritis after uterine cleaning versus no cleaning in cesarean sections: Randomized clinical trial.

AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the rates of postpartum endometritis due to uterine cleaning and no cleaning in patients delivered by elective cesarean section. METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial conducted at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Suez Canal University Hospital, Ismailia, from June 2019 to November 2019. We recruited patients undergoing cesarean delivery aged 18-45 years with singleton pregnancy, intact membranes, either first or repeated delivery, without labor pains. Patients were allocated into two groups, uterine cleaning (336 patients) and no cleaning (312 patients). The main outcome measure was the occurrence of postpartum endometritis. RESULTS: Both groups were matched in their demographic characters. Twelve patients (3.6%) developed endometritis in the cleaning group versus one patient (0.3%) in the other one. Estimated blood loss was 754.35 ± 247.13 and 730.36 ± 232.77 for the cleaning and no cleaning groups, respectively, with a P value of 0.201. Septic wound infection (21 patients, 6.3%) was predominant in the cleaning group. CONCLUSION: Uterine cleaning after delivery of the placenta during CS can be omitted as a surgical step during the operation. It was associated with increased rates of postpartum endometritis and blood loss.

Management of clinical chorioamnionitis: an evidence-based approach.

This review aimed to examine the existing evidence about interventions proposed for the treatment of clinical chorioamnionitis, with the goal of developing an evidence-based contemporary approach for the management of this condition. Most trials that assessed the use of antibiotics in clinical chorioamnionitis included patients with a gestational age of ≥34 weeks and in labor. The first-line antimicrobial regimen for the treatment of clinical chorioamnionitis is ampicillin combined with gentamicin, which should be initiated during the intrapartum period. In the event of a cesarean delivery, patients should receive clindamycin at the time of umbilical cord clamping. The administration of additional antibiotic therapy does not appear to be necessary after vaginal or cesarean delivery. However, if postdelivery antibiotics are prescribed, there is support for the administration of an additional dose. Patients can receive antipyretic agents, mainly acetaminophen, even though there is no clear evidence of their benefits. Current evidence suggests that the administration of antenatal corticosteroids for fetal lung maturation and of magnesium sulfate for fetal neuroprotection to patients with clinical chorioamnionitis between 24 0/7 and 33 6/7 weeks of gestation, and possibly between 23 0/7 and 23 6/7 weeks of gestation, has an overall beneficial effect on the infant. However, delivery should not be delayed to complete the full course of corticosteroids and magnesium sulfate. Once the diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis has been established, delivery should be considered, regardless of the gestational age. Vaginal delivery is the safer option and cesarean delivery should be reserved for standard obstetrical indications. The time interval between the diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis and delivery is not related to most adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Patients may require a higher dose of oxytocin to achieve adequate uterine activity or greater uterine activity to effect a given change in cervical dilation. The benefit of using continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in these patients is unclear. We identified the following promising interventions for the management of clinical chorioamnionitis: (1) an antibiotic regimen including ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, and metronidazole that provides coverage against the most commonly identified microorganisms in patients with clinical chorioamnionitis; (2) vaginal cleansing with antiseptic solutions before cesarean delivery with the aim of decreasing the risk of endometritis and, possibly, postoperative wound infection; and (3) antenatal administration of N-acetylcysteine, an antioxidant and antiinflammatory agent, to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality. Well-powered randomized controlled trials are needed to assess these interventions in patients with clinical chorioamnionitis.

The efficacy of two doses versus 7 days' course of prophylactic antibiotics following cesarean section: An experience from Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital.

Background: Postcesarean wound infection is a leading cause of prolonged hospital stay. Considerable debates still exist regarding choice of antibiotics, dose, and duration of use. Objectives: The objective is to compare the efficacy of 2 doses of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid versus a 7 days combination of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and metronidazole as prophylactic antibiotics following cesarean section (CS). Methodology: It was a randomized controlled trial that was conducted among 160 women undergoing CS at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital. Women were randomized into two groups. Group I (study group) received 2 doses of 1.2 g amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Group II (control group) received a 7 days course of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and metronidazole. The data obtained were analyzed using SPSS version 17. Categorical (qualitative) variables were analyzed using Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test as appropriate while continuous (quantitative) variables were analyzed using independent sample t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There was no statistically significant association in the occurrence of fever (12.8% vs. 15.8%, P = 0.6), wound infection (6.4% vs. 10.5%, P = 0.36), endometritis (7.7% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.38), UTI (6.4% vs. 5.3%, P = 1.00), mean duration of hospital stay (129.7 vs. 134.2 h, P = 0.48), and neonatal outcomes between the two groups. There was statistically significant difference in the mean cost of antibiotics (₦2883/US$9.5 vs. ₦7040/US$23.1, P < 0.001) and maternal side effects (10.3% vs. 26.3%, P < 0.001) between the study and the control groups, respectively. Conclusion: This study found no statistically significant difference in infectious morbidity, duration of hospital stay, and neonatal outcomes when two doses of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid was compared with a 7 days course of prophylactic antibiotic following CS. The use of two doses of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid has the advantages of reduced cost and some maternal side effects. The two doses were cheaper with minimal side effects.

RésuméContexte: L'infection des plaies post-césariennes est l'une des principales causes d'hospitalisation prolongée. Des débats considérables existent toujours concernant le choix antibiotiques, dose et durée d'utilisation. Objectifs: L'objectif est de comparer l'efficacité de 2 doses d'acide amoxicilline-clavulanique par rapport à 7 jours association d'acide amoxicilline-clavulanique et de métronidazole comme antibiotiques prophylactiques après une césarienne (CS). Méthodologie: c'était un essai contrôlé randomisé mené auprès de 160 femmes subissant une CS à l'hôpital universitaire Aminu Kano. Les femmes ont été randomisées en deux groupes. Le groupe I (groupe d'étude) a reçu 2 doses d'acide amoxicilline-clavulanique de 1,2 g. Le groupe II (groupe témoin) a reçu 7 jours de l'acide amoxicilline-clavulanique et du métronidazole. Les données obtenues ont été analysées à l'aide de SPSS version 17. Catégorie (qualitative) les variables ont été analysées à l'aide du test du chi carré et du test exact de Fisher, selon le cas, tandis que les variables continues (quantitatives) ont été analysées en utilisant un test t pour échantillon indépendant. P <0,05 était considéré comme statistiquement significatif. Résultats: Il n'y avait pas d'association statistiquement significative en cas de fièvre (12,8% vs 15,8%, P = 0,6), infection des plaies (6,4% vs 10,5%, P = 0,36), endométrite (7,7% vs 11,8%, P = 0,38), IVU (6,4% contre 5,3%, P = 1,00), durée moyenne de séjour à l'hôpital (129,7 contre 134,2 h, P = 0,48) et résultats néonatals entre les deux groupes. Il y avait une différence statistiquement significative dans le coût moyen des antibiotiques (83 2883 / US $ 9,5 contre ₦ 7040 / US $ 23,1, P <0,001) et côté maternel effets (10,3% contre 26,3%, P <0,001) entre l'étude et les groupes témoins, respectivement. Conclusion: Cette étude n'a trouvé aucune statistique différence significative dans la morbidité infectieuse, la durée du séjour à l'hôpital et les résultats néonatals lorsque deux doses d'amoxicilline-clavulanique l'acide a été comparé à un traitement antibiotique prophylactique de 7 jours après la CS. L'utilisation de deux doses d'acide amoxicilline-clavulanique a avantages du coût réduit et de certains effets secondaires maternels. Les deux doses étaient moins chères avec des effets secondaires minimes.

Routine uterine culture swab during cesarean section and its clinical correlations: A retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: Cesarean sections, particularly non-elective cesareans, are an important risk factor for the development of postpartum endometritis, a leading cause of postpartum febrile morbidity. We evaluated the yield of obtaining routine intrauterine culture during elective and non-elective cesarean sections, in the prevention and management of postpartum endometritis. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study investigating the distribution of uterine cultures obtained immediately after fetus and placenta delivery during cesarean sections performed in a single tertiary hospital during 2017. True pathogenic bacteria were included in the study analysis and considered as positive results, while other contaminant bacteria were excluded. RESULTS: Positive uterine cultures were identified in 10.7 % (88/821) of cesarean sections, with no significant difference in prevalence between elective and non-elective cesareans. Escherichia coli (E.coli), isolated in 40.9 % of the positive cultures of all women, was the most common organism in non-elective cesareans vs. Group B Streptococcus (GBS) in elective cesareans. Higher rate of positive cultures was found in term vs. preterm cesareans (17.5 % vs 10.5 %, respectively, p-value = 0.04). E.coli was the most frequent pathogen reported in both women with intact membranes or premature rupture of membranes (46.3 % and 47.3 % respectively). Eight women (9.1 %) with positive cultures presented with postpartum fever; all had undergone non-elective cesarean section. In one-third of these cases the empirical antibiotic treatment was adjusted according to the uterine culture results and susceptibility testing results. CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining routine intrauterine cultures during non-elective cesarean sections might be useful for detecting significant pathogens and tailoring the antibiotic treatment in postpartum endometritis.